Valentine’s Day in Islam?

By Paul Salahuddin Armstrong
Co-Director, AOBM

I was asked to share my views on Valentine’s Day. Personally, I really don’t see what’s the problem that some people seem to have with this celebration. The fact that it’s a Western, originally Christian festival is in all honesty, completely besides the point. We should celebrate Love everyday!

Many cultures have something similar, a day to celebrate love, to send a message of love to your beloved – a person whom you would like to marry or is already your husband or wife. Seriously, what’s wrong with that? What could possibly be wrong with that?

The only argument I’ve heard against Valentine’s Day, is the same one I hear about every other festival besides the two Eids – it’s not part of Islam. Well, sorry, if that’s the best these people can come up with, it’s a pathetic argument – cars and aeroplanes aren’t technically part of Islam either, but we still use them!

More to the point, a Muslim can celebrate any festival, even the social aspect of those of other religions, as long as this doesn’t mean they end up committing shirk – i.e. worshipping another deity besides God or associating partners with God – and this is the position of the mainstream scholars of Al-Azhar University in Egypt.

Indeed, for the vast majority of people who celebrate it, Valentine’s Day isn’t even that religious, rather it’s just a wonderful opportunity to show loved ones how much you appreciate them – which is something every Muslim should do anyway, even if they do not celebrate Valentine’s Day!

Happy Mawlid 2012

Is Christmas Haram?


By Paul Salahuddin Armstrong

Co-Director, The Association of British Muslims

As Muslims, we shouldn’t be afraid of Christmas or any other festival. Nowhere in the Holy Qur’an is wishing people a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah or even a Happy Diwali declared haram (forbidden) – it’s just not there, if you don’t believe me, study your Qur’an, please don’t just take my word for it!

While the Qur’an does question certain beliefs that many Christians may hold, it doesn’t forbid wishing people a Merry Christmas or even joining in with some of the festivities, like having a halal Christmas dinner. To suggest otherwise and go around telling other people these are haram is to be a cause of fitnah. This type of behaviour is itself biddah too, as we should lead through example (like our Prophet, peace be upon him), not through bullying people! If we followed this approach like Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and his noble companions, may Allah reward them, we would develop ourselves more and build a better more friendly and supportive community.

“And strive hard in God’s cause with all the striving that is due to Him: it is He who has elected you [to carry His message], and has laid no hardship on you in [anything that pertains to] religion…”
- Holy Qur’an 22:78 (M. Asad)

The mullahs who promote the idea that Christmas is haram, are the very same people responsible for the lack of development within the Muslim community and traditionally Muslim nations. Not only are they opposed to Christmas, but many things characteristic of our present time. Labelling everything ‘haram’ will get us nowhere, and indeed will only tie us all up in knots, preventing us from doing anything really useful with our lives. Very few things were declared haram by the Holy Qur’an or by our Prophet, peace be upon him, and those that were (e.g. murder, stealing, the consumption of alcohol and pork etc.), are mostly common sense, as they’re harmful to us, or to our brothers and sisters in our human family.

“And thus have We willed you to be a community of the middle way…” – Holy Qur’an 2:143 (M. Asad)

What we need to cultivate, is a more constructive attitude, be less judge-mental, study more, develop ourselves and our critical reasoning skills. We should not be taking mullahs as our idols! Real scholars do not seek to be worshipped, but seek only to learn, develop themselves and help others to do the same. Real scholars do not seek to manipulate and control people as sadly many mullahs are doing today.

Let’s leave these mullahs and strive to understand the Holy Qur’an and the teachings of our Prophet, peace be upon him, and to implement them in our own lives. In the process, we will develop a new generation of true scholars and professionals in all fields, who will take a genuine interpretation of Islam and the Muslim community from strength to strength, forward, working towards building a better future for all humankind!

Merry Christmas 2011

Happy Eid al Adha 1432! (2011)

My Journey To Islam

www.presstv.com/Program/202877.html

UN Vote on Palestine and Prospects for Peace in the Middle-East

By Paul Salahuddin Armstrong
21 September 2011

Recently, I’ve been asked about my views on Palestine and the future prospects for peace in the Middle-East. This Friday, President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority is expected to officially submit a request to recognise Palestinian statehood. What then are the future prospects for a peaceful and secure Palestinian state?

Before I discuss this any further, I think it’s important to reflect a little on the history of Palestine and Israel. The state of Israel was founded on 14 May 1948 by Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, this was the same day the British mandate over Palestine came to an end. On the following day, Israel was invaded by troops from Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.

As a consequence of this war, Israel had captured much of the land originally allocated for a Palestinian state, while the West Bank was left under Jordanian control and Gaza under Egyptian control. To all intents and purposes, the only sovereign state remaining within the borders of the Palestinian mandate, was Israel. This is what Palestinians refer to as the Nakba or the catastrophe. In the decades since, there have been other wars between Israel and her neighbours, which I’m not going to discuss here, as one could quite easily write a whole book about them.

Before 1948, the land between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan was administered by Great Britain, under the terms of the Palestinian Mandate. This had been the situation since the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I. Before that, the territory had been part of the Ottoman Empire for around 400 years, as was true for much of the wider region.

I believe it’s important to remember these historical facts, the consequences of which mean that as far as the Middle-East is concerned, all the lines on the map have only been drawn in relatively recent times. Under the Ottomans, many of these borders didn’t exist at all, and those there were, far more permeable than today. Why are these facts not more readily highlighted? Is it because this represents an uncomfortable reality for not only Israelis and Palestinians, but for other people living in the region? Ultimately, all national borders are man-made and not natural occurrences, unless they actually follow the course of a river, mountain range or sea.

Many people today do not really understand their origins, the history of their own nations or how in reality all people are far more interrelated and connected, than many are prepared to admit. Herein lies the real root of troubles and enmity between different groups of people and this is as true of the situation in the Middle-East as anywhere else. Even people who think they know their history, oftentimes only know a version of it coloured by their own nation’s bias. Some Lithuanians for instance, believe the real borders of their country extend from the Baltic to the Black Sea. Somehow, I think the Poles, Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians, may hold to a rather different reading of eastern European history…

Two sovereign states clearly can’t exist on the same piece of land, no matter how one looks at it! This means where border disputes exist, people need to compromise. Surely peace and security are more valuable than constant feuds, which result in suffering and untimely deaths of large numbers of our brothers and sisters in our human family, the destruction of nations, cultures and heritage, while wasting the very resources that if used more wisely, would ensure the peace and prosperity of all the peoples involved in these conflicts.

Rather than money, fear and hatred are more often than not, the root of many evils. When people feel scared, they will do anything they believe will ensure their security and self-preservation. Fear and hatred are the biggest problems in Israel and Palestine; the consequence of people on both sides misunderstanding the other, this compounded by tensions being allowed to fester for more than 60 years.

Many Palestinians do not understand why Jews want to live in Israel, have their own state or why so many Jewish people migrated to this area over the past 6 decades. Rather shockingly, the Holocaust is believed by many to have been a Zionist-Freemasonic-Illuminati hoax, to allow Jews to steal their land. Many do not realise that there are Jewish people, who have legitimately bought and paid for much of the land they now own in Israel. Rather than promoting a more wholesome understanding of what has really transpired, Palestinian leaders and activists often promote this rendering of the situation, as they believe it serves their interest of establishing an independent Palestinian state.

We cannot deny there have been many injustices committed against Palestinians by Israelis, and there is the ongoing problem of settlements in the Palestinian territories. However, the Palestinian cause is itself not free from dodgy propaganda and doesn’t give due acknowledgement to the fact that many of these human rights abuses, have been highlighted by Israeli human rights activists. This in spite of the fact that many Palestinians foment hatred against all Israelis, not only those responsible for crimes against Palestinians.

Many Israelis on the other hand, live in Israel as a consequence of themselves, their parents or grandparents suffering persecution elsewhere in the world. Jews moved to Israel from Germany and eastern Europe during and after the Second World War, as a consequence of the Nazi Holocaust, a racist, hate filled genocide against their entire people and religion. After 1948, Jews had to leave many predominantly Muslim countries in fear of their lives, where their families had previously lived for centuries, often losing all of their assets in the process. Is it any wonder many of these people feel the need to build walls today, when this is their historical, in some cases still a personal memory?

Obviously one group of people’s suffering, doesn’t give them the right to inflict suffering upon another group of people. But time and again, we see this has happened throughout history. Anyone who has some insights into human psychology would understand why. Unless we understand what is really going on in the Middle-East, how can we genuinely work towards a peaceful solution.

Such is the level of tensions between the two groups of people, if a Palestinian leader strives for a peaceful solution, he’ll be seen as a sell-out. Similar is true of Israeli politicians, they would be committing electoral suicide! The only way out of this situation as I see it, is work needs to be done at the grassroots level in both Israeli and Palestinian communities. A way must be facilitated for ordinary Israelis and Palestinians to get to know one another, to understand the situation of people in the other community, why they are living in Israel/Palestine, their history and culture. If we want a genuine Middle-East peace process, this is the way forward.

Compromised politicians and UN votes may perhaps achieve an increased level of autonomy for the Palestinian Authority, but this alone will never create peace, unless it is part of a more comprehensive strategy to tackle fear, racism and hatred; engendering peace, security and understanding in their stead.

See the labels are killing us


nayzak.deviantart.com

Well-trodden Paths – a look at the Shari’ah

By Sheikh Daoud Rosser-Owen
Amir, AOBM

The famous Tudor dramaturge, Christopher Marlowe, wrote circa 1592 to the Prologue of his play The Jew of Malta, “I count religion but a childish toy, And hold there is no sin but ignorance”.

While I don’t agree with him about religion, nor the solitariness of the sin, I certainly hold with him that ignorance is sinful. I don’t mean ‘ignorance’ as in simply not knowing something. I mean ‘ignorance’ as refusing to find out. Indeed, in these days of the easy accessibility of information through the Internet and widespread literacy, I would consider such ‘ignorance’ not merely to be a sin, but worse – a willful and inexcusable self-indulgence. And, as it affects Islam and Muslims in the British Isles and even elsewhere in that putative entity ‘The West’, outrageous and with the wrong people positively dangerous. It should be needless to say that this works both ways.

At the moment it is quite common, even fashionable, among many to denigrate and anathematise the Shari’ah, used as a shorthand for Islamic Law or more accurately as one for the degenerate legal systems applied in certain Muslim countries – which is not at all the same thing.

There is also the understandable reaction to a more immediate problem of the ignorant demands from certain Muslims of Britain, and their umbrella organisations, for the application in the UK of some concept that they describe as “Shari’ah” or “Islamic Law”, but which is actually little better than an Islamic label stuck crudely over some imported cultural or customary code that in all too many dimensions touches Islam itself only notionally.

It is sadly true that there is some justification for these responses.

However reacting from ignorance is not helpful. Yet what else can people do when they are let down by those whose professional duty it used to be (according to the Great John Delane, sometime Editor of The Times, in his famous editorial “The Earl of Derby remarked…” of Friday, 6 February, 1852)  “to educate and inform” but who nowadays seem to take it as being to promote ignorance and dissention? Few people are orientalists, and the generations who were born, grew up and served in the Empire have largely passed out of public life.

The aim of this essay is an attempt to fill in the gap abandoned by journalism. It is largely adapted from my monograph (as yet unpublished because not quite complete) on Tory Fundamentalism and Muslim Ideas of State, and it has been revised in the light of two Reports recently released on Islamophobia: that by Spinwatch, “The Cold War on British Muslims” (available to read at http://www.scribd.com/doc/61402174/The-Cold-War-on-British-Muslims and as a PDF at http://www.spinwatch.org/images/The_Cold_War on_British_Muslims_July_2011.pdf) and that by the Center for American Progress, “Fear, Inc. The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America” (available to read and to download as a PDF at http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/islamophobia.html).

It is possible that I actually was the first to coin the word “Islamophobia” in an Editorial I wrote in Q-News International in early 1995 – I had formed the word as a derivative from, and allusion to, “homophobia” – which was picked up by the Runnymede Trust’s Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia, set up in 1996, in its first Report “Islamophobia: a challenge for us all”, published in 1997. On reflection, seeing how things have developed more towards outright hatred of Islam and Muslims rather than an irrational fear, it would have been more appropriate for me to have called it “Islamomisia”. I had toyed with the idea, and dismissed it as being too academically obscure for a newspaper editorial.

About two years ago, in I think 2008, there was published in one of the UK’s daily broadsheets the results of a survey among Muslims, largely in the Midlands and north-east of England, asking whether they wanted Shari’ah in the UK. Many answered ‘yes’, but the questions remain what did the respondents understand by the request, did they think that there was a realistic possibility of it actually happening, or were they reacting to some massive hypothetical “If”?

Much has been made of the apparent results of this poll. So, following from this, what does the word Shari’ah mean for the average UK Muslim – or the proverbial ‘Muslim on the Clapham omnibus’ – and the average UK non-Muslim? And what does this actually mean for them at the operative level of daily life?

There used not to be an educated person unfamiliar with that verse from Jeremiah (6:16), “interrogate de semitis antiquis quae sit via bona et ambulate in ea” (ask after the old paths where is the good way and walk in it). This “good way” (via bona) is the well-trodden path of the prophets and patriarchs, and is the Way of Truth that all these have called people to follow.

The Muslims do not see their Way as being different from this but as a continuation of this well-trodden path, though all communities at various places, times, and circumstances have needed specific guidance for their conditions. As stated in the Quran “for every one of you We have ordained a Code and a Good Way” (li kulli ja’alna minkum shir’atan wa minhaja)(Q5:48). This via bona is none other than the Shari’ah – a ‘well-trodden path to that watering hole’ (which is what the word actually means) of laws and conduct derived from what has been sent down from the Almighty from which the Mosaic Law of the Torah, much of the Canon Law of the Christians, and the corpus of Islamic Law drink deep. To Muslims, each of these Abrahamic Faiths (as the late Professor Isma’il al-Faruqi, al shahid, termed them) has its own Shari’ah: its own track (semita) on the Way (via) of Truth.

Read more of this post

Happy Eid ul Fitr! 1432 (2011)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.